RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02039
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His records be corrected to reflect he was issued a DD Form 4, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document - Armed Forces of the United States, upon graduation from the United States Air Force Academy (USAFA).
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He graduated from the USAFA and was commissioned as a second lieutenant (O-1); however, a DD Form 4 was never generated. The form does not appear in his virtual Military Personnel Flight (vMPF), Automated Records Management System (ARMS), or Personnel Records Display Application (PRDA), and no one at the Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC) has been able to locate his form.
The applicants complete submission is at Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in the grade O-1.
On 23 May 2012, an AF IMT 133, Oath of Office (Military Personnel) was initiated showing the applicant was commissioned into the Regular Air Force.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ USAFA/A1A recommends denial. The USAFA does not prepare a DD Form 4 on commissioned officers who enter into active duty. In accordance with DODI 1304.02, Accessions Processing Data Collection Forms, the applicant does not fall into the proper category to receive a DD Form 4 because it is only utilized on enlisted personnel. However, he should have received an AF 133 upon graduation of the USAFA.
A complete copy of the HQ USAFA/A1A evaluation is at Exhibit C.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 23 January 2015 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief.
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-02039 in Executive Session on 3 March 2015, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Panel Chair
Member
Member
The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-02039 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 13 May 2014.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ USAFA/A1A, dated 6 January 2015,
w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 23 January 2015.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02829
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02829 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His name be included in the official list of United States Air Force Academy (USAFA) graduates, class of 1966. On 28 Apr 66, according to the DD Form 785, Record of Disenrollment from Officer Candidate-Type Training, the applicant was disenrolled for breach of Cadet Honor Code. Applicant did not file within three...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04091
On 31 Jan 11, the applicant was disenrolled from USAFA and placed in a Leave Without Pay status while awaiting a decision from the Secretary of the Air Force (SecAF) as to whether he would be ordered to active duty, or required to reimburse the government for the cost of his USAFA education. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02840
He suffered from a serious brain tumor condition that was corrected by surgery and removal of the tumor was more than three years ago. The board finds the member unfit for duty at this time and he should be placed on the TDRL and re-evaluated in 18 months. The applicant contends that he is fit for duty and there is no reason to question the Commandant of Cadets who indicated the applicant was fulfilling all duties required of cadets at the time he was placed on TDRL.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02323
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02323 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 4L (Separated Commissioning Program Eliminee) be changed to a code that would allow him to reenlist. Since the Air Force Academy is a commissioning program, this code is appropriate regardless of the reason for separation. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00881
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: USAFA/A1A recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. However, the Army Personnel Office that is assisting the applicant should take the statement in Block 18 of his DD Form 214 as proof that he was in fact a cadet at a service academy during that...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 01915
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01915 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO CONGRESSIONAL INTEREST: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 4L (separated commissioning program) be changed to RE-12 (recommended for reenlistment). Examiners Note: Code RE-12 is not an Air Force reenlistment eligibility code. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00847
The applicant has not provided sufficient evidence which would lead us to believe that at the time of her discharge, a physical condition existed that was determined by competent medical authority to be a physical disability which specifically rendered her unfit for continued military service. However, we note that although the Air Force is required to rate disabilities in accordance with the DVA Schedule for Rating Disabilities, the DVA operates under a totally separate system with a...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02704
AFRC/A1A recommends denial, indicating there is no basis to assume the applicant would have been selected for position vacancy promotion by the lieutenant colonel promotion board, or hired as an AGR. We note the applicant filed an IG complaint alleging, among other things, that members of his chain of command unfairly denied him the opportunity to apply for multiple AGR positions and damaged his reputation by providing negative references to potential employers in retaliation for his...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01492
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01492 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: USAFA/A1A recommends denying the applicants request to change his RE code. The applicants attorney states the applicant did not have the right to counsel at his...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02117
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02117 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, Block 27, Reentry Code be changed from 4L, which denotes Separated commissioning program eliminee (OTS, AECP, and so on) to a code suitable for reentry into the armed services...